http://biz.yahoo.com/bizj/070223/1423209.html?.v=1
In other fields I often question this company's analysts... I wonder how they figure that Wikipedia, which has no ads and is a nonprofit foundation, and Netflix, which is a mail order company that spends oodles on Internet advertising (and undoubtedly doesn't want increased competition increasing their advertising costs), stand to benefit from it. Or did they just throw a bunch of names into a hat?
My bet is that they just grabbed the highest profile names without a thought about their role in the Internet. Then again, maybe they know something about Wikipedia that we are not privy to.
Ken Barbalace - EnvironmentalChemistry.com (Environmental Careers, Blog)
InternetSAR.org: Volunteers Assisting Search and Rescue via the Internet
My Firefox Theme Classic Compact: Based onFirefox's classic theme but uses much less window space
I agree. I don't understand how they picked those websites...
Craigslist, no ads either.
A company like Netflix, which brings in customers through online advertising would actually have a negative effect because of increasing ad cost pressure.
The report is from some investment bank. May be I will email them and ask.
Make more money - Read my Web Publishing Blog
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks