Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Copyright Law

  1. #1
    Registered Member incka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wakefield, UK, EU
    Posts
    3,801

    Copyright Law

    In the UK it is 70 years after the author of the works death. It used to be 50 years until an EU directive changed it.

    I personally would like the following, whichever is first:

    *15 years after authors death.
    *50 years after works creation

  2. #2
    Web Monkey MarkB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,783
    I think it's fine the way it is.
    Stepping On Wires - the new blog

  3. #3
    Registered Member incka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wakefield, UK, EU
    Posts
    3,801
    Explain why people OTHER THAN THE AUTHOR should have a monopoly over the authors work after the author can no longer benifit from it?

  4. #4
    Web Monkey MarkB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,783
    Why are you complaining? Because YOU want to profit from their work without paying a cent!

    The thing is, the authors work is their property, and if they choose to pass that property onto another body (be it a family member, group, or otherwise) as part of their estate, on their death, then that is THEIR business.
    Stepping On Wires - the new blog

  5. #5
    Registered Member incka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wakefield, UK, EU
    Posts
    3,801
    The UKGov link in your sig is missing a dot and you haven't approved any of the comments yet.

  6. #6
    Web Monkey MarkB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,783
    Thanks and thanks for taking part in the blog.
    Stepping On Wires - the new blog

  7. #7
    I'm the oogie boogie man! James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,566
    Wooh! GO MARK!

    I'd say that it's fine if companys still profit from it; it means they'll still push it in advertising and stuff, so the work is spread out more.

    I also think that it'd be nice if people could inherit copyrights. Or can they already?

  8. #8
    Website Developer
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,607
    I'd like to see copyright cut down to about 15 or 20 years; in some cases less. The copyright owner's death is kind of null and void since rights are bought and sold all the time. I think Michael Jackson owned the Beatle's rights. Of course you don't want someone getting killed over copyright either.

    Computer games are the best example. There is very little market for PC games that are 10 years old. I know of a few "abandonware" sites that have old games for download. The copyright makes distribution of these games very difficult, legally. PC game companies come and go, are bought, sold, merged, and no one knows who owns the copyright. The same case is being made for old movies as well; of course this is more like the 50 year mark.

    Patents are what, 15 years? Much more reasonable I believe. Some people want to abolish patent and copyright altogether. I'd just prefer they but cut short quite a bit.
    Make more money - Read my Web Publishing Blog

  9. #9
    Website Developer
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,607
    As for an eternal copyright, when copyright was originally established in the United States it was recognized as a temporary monopoly. Why should someone else profit from my work? Just the same, why should I have to pay royalties to play someone else's song whether I'm making a profit or not?

    Certainly a deep issue. I just believe limiting copyright encourages creators to keep producing quality work. Just look at famous artists. The original works go for million upon millions of dollars yet the copyright is public domain.
    Make more money - Read my Web Publishing Blog

  10. #10
    Registered Xander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    263
    I think copyright law dates should be something like 25-50 years after creation. Its defintely good to encourage new quality work, like patents are for only fairly short period of time.

  11. #11
    Web Monkey MarkB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,783
    I believe if someone has the talent, and drive, to create something of worth from thin air (such as a book, painting, piece of music), then they should be able to enjoy the fruits of those endeavours for as long as they can. If they want to release it to the public domain, that's up to them, but if I were to write a book now that amazed the world, why should I lose control of it in 25 years?
    Stepping On Wires - the new blog

  12. #12
    Administrator Chris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    East Lansing, MI USA
    Posts
    7,055
    I read an interesting proposal once where they would require copyright to be renewed every x number of years. The cost would be $1, but you'd only pay it if you wanted to bother with it. So many old video games would likely be out of copyright.

    However, don't forget that copyright also covers derivative works. Just because no one plays the original Donkey Kong anymore doesn't mean that the characters of Donkey Kong or Mario aren't in other newer games.

    Personally I just hope they don't keep extending it. Next time Mickey Mouse is about to enter the public domain I see Disney again trying to lobby for an extension of copyright, and any more increases and it'll be insane (I think its already 120 years for something owned by a corporation).
    Chris Beasley - My Guide to Building a Successful Website[size=1]
    Content Sites: ABCDFGHIJKLMNOP|Forums: ABCD EF|Ecommerce: Swords Knives

  13. #13
    Registered Member incka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wakefield, UK, EU
    Posts
    3,801
    I think a lot of copyright is ignored...

    1) George Orwell - His works are on thousands of university sites and even on some government sites.
    2) Pong, Space Invaders, Tetris - Exact replacas all over the place.

  14. #14
    I'm the oogie boogie man! James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,566
    Indeed, Incka.

    I'd be suprised if video games (such as Test Drive which has it in its "loading" menu) which are large and in-the-open didn't obey these laws though. And large corperations don't go after http://angelfire.com/co/jims~super~d...e/homepage.htm (fake URL) because it has a picture of a picachu (sp?) on it.

Similar Threads

  1. copyright
    By thebillionaire in forum Business and Legal Issues
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-10-2004, 03:56 PM
  2. copyright question
    By s2kinteg916 in forum Business and Legal Issues
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-05-2004, 08:37 AM
  3. Need input on Copyright $$ offer
    By antseezee in forum Business and Legal Issues
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-16-2004, 03:08 PM
  4. Crown Copyright
    By cpnmm in forum Business and Legal Issues
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-20-2004, 04:53 PM
  5. Copyright question...
    By tragu in forum Business and Legal Issues
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-23-2004, 12:12 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •