Printable View
None of us could "get" you banned here. Only your actions can get you banned here. Just as it has been your actions that got you banned elsewhere.
We are not forcing you to call people names. And we are not forcing you to be extremely rude to others. You are doing this on your own and it is these actions that will get you banned, not your position on SPF, and not your protest against SPF.
If you join at SitePoint, and I know about it, I'll ban you. That's my (volunteer) job. We don't allow previously banned members to rejoin. What happens here is beyond my control. Chris will do what he wants.Quote:
Originally Posted by FPU
Arguing with you further, is beneath me.
Yeah OK guys, keep the propaganda coming! :D
You guys refuse to address the issues, you just want to censor the truth by banning someone, but Chris has been down that road with me before, he is not stupid guys! :D
Then he'll be your problem. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Nintendo
Grow up Bleys, one day you might just do that!
Most of us miss him. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Bleys
In other news....
Who wants it!!! :DQuote:
This domain name IS AVAILABLE:
SITEPOINTSUCKS.COM
I am sure these guys will buy it to protect Sitepoint as they do here! :D
I guess they don't care that Sitepoint happens to be stealing content from their members who post by not showing signatures to guests!
That is alright with them as long as they sit in their high places in their vain minds as SitePoint staff, but the members of the community will cut them up good in the next few days on these issues!
I am going to make sure that we all get answers from Sitepoint founders, if they do not address these issues and answer all of my questions then their problems will continue!
I really don't understand what is so bad about sitepoint.com. Just because they demoted Chris doesn't mean they are a really bad forum. They still have very informative posts. I just really need some help with this one, I don't really understand what is so bad about Chris getting demoted
I guess you need to read this thread again and follow all the links to really understand!
You do realize that is is perfectly within your rights to not post in the first place, right? No forum is under any obligation to allow non-members to see member signatures.Quote:
Originally Posted by FPU
And SitePoint clearly states in their Guidelines, which you can view before you join, that they reserve the right to republish your words. If you disagree, then don't join or post. It's as simple as that. No one ever forced you to use SitePoint.
Guess what man, I don't care what Sitepoint administrators rules are, got it :confused:
They better care what I say though or Sitepoint is toast!
FPU, you do realize that your protest could end up solidifying the support of SPF moderators behind SP and as a result some of the moderators who may be thinking of resigning over the current issues will end up not resigning? Basically you could end up driving more people to SPF than you convince to leave SPF. This is very counterproductive to your goals.
If you really want to "do in" SPF then remember, an assasin is quiet and subtle. Stealth and cunning wins the day.
KLB, please don't try to give me advice (propaganda) OK!
I just don't really get it, he only lost his little title and a blog. What is so good about that? I just don't understand, he wouldn't have been in that rank if SP hadn't have started there forum, now they demote him from there own forum and everybody goes crazy.Quote:
Originally Posted by FPU
When you read this thread and follow the links and read them you will understand that it is more than just Chris (Aspen) as an issue here!
This signature issue is much bigger than Chris could ever be, Sitepoint just has all these issues hitting right at the same time now!
Don't you all feel sorry for them! :confused: :(
PS: I sure as hell don't :eek: