PDA

View Full Version : Free dating site makes $300k a month from Adsense



Cutter
03-22-2006, 04:13 PM
I just did a search to double-check, but it appears no one has made a post about this yet. PlentyofFish.com is making big headlines since its owner has gone public about his Adsense earnings on WebmasterWorld.

This story is deep and there is a very smart guy behind it. I've copied my newest blog post about this below:

When I hear a story of online success, I'm all over it. I want to understand the beliefs and outlook on the person behind it and what they did to make it successful. After plenty of these great success stories this year, here comes another one that perhaps tops all of them.

By now you probably have heard about Markus Frind of PlentyofFish.com. He has gone public both on forums (http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum89/12751.htm) and in interviews about making $1 million in 3 months from Adsense.

I first ran into this story a few days ago reading this blog post (http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/03/04/the-role-of-anti-marketing-design/) on "anti-marketing" design. Up against other popular dating sites, PlentyofFish's design would lead you to believe that Markus would be lucky to be making about $30 a day; in fact, in 2003 he was making $40 a day from Adsense (although this may have been from other sites.)

So lets back up; is it the design that makes his site successful? Between saved bandwidth expenses, and a better Google clickthrough rate, I think it is very important. However, as I dug further into this story I discovered that behind this simple design was a very complex system and someone who worked smart & hard to be sucessful; here is a direct quote from WMW (http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum23/4496-4-10.htm) :

Keeping my site fast and running is one of my smallest issues.

1. Approving and editing 20,000 images/day
2. BLocking 1000 nigerian russian scams, escorts etc per day.
3. Blocking fake accounts, trouble makers etc.
4. 100k+ edits/modications/day

5 to 10% of yahoo's and the industries total signups are scams escorts etc. I'd guess these guys steal on the order of $100-400 million per year from the industry.

How does he moderate all of this? Automation. This is brilliant. Considering other companies must hire hundreds of employees to do all of this, I suspect he is looking at a multi-million dollar buyout within a matter of months. Could he go the way of craigslist and resist it? I don't know; he's waving a big flag trying to get a lot of attention right now, and its certainly working.

This story reminds me about computer games. There has been such a huge focus on graphics the last 10 years that gameplay is rarely innovative and often hollow. The same can be said of websites. Post a link on Sitepoint and people are all over you about web standards, not "does your website work and does it help people?" The ugliness of Myspace was the first big single that may be pretty designs aren't important; PlentyofFish is the nail in the coffen.

As humans one of our biggest weaknesses is becoming obsessed with what is not important. We spend 90% of our time on that little 5% -- and that is why so many of us fail. PlentyofFish is an example of what happens when someone understands that its not the fancy design that brings in visitors, its something else. He understands that search engine traffic is important, but its even more important to have visitors that come back to your site again and again.

There is a lot more to say about this story, but for today I'll leave you to dig deeper here. I suspect Markus is being bombarded with media inquiries but I'm going to try to get an interview with him anyways.

Sagewing
03-22-2006, 04:28 PM
How does the automation work? Automated workflow, automated administration? Is there any detail? I'm curious :D

r2d2
03-22-2006, 05:08 PM
Nice post Andrew. Inspiring story, and yes it does help you focus on the things you should be focusing on.

Cutter
03-22-2006, 07:17 PM
How does the automation work? Automated workflow, automated administration? Is there any detail? I'm curious :D

The technical issues are here: http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum23/4496.htm

It also appears he issued a press release:
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/3/prweb360802.htm

Blue Cat Buxton
03-23-2006, 02:44 AM
Good post Cutter.


The technical issues are here: http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum23/4496.htm

It also appears he issued a press release:
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/3/prweb360802.htm

And from this:
Please no inquiries from venture capitalists, marketers, or partnership opportunities.

That sounds like "hay give me a call!" or am I just being cynical ?

Cutter
03-23-2006, 12:11 PM
He didn't list acquisitions.

Mike
03-23-2006, 01:11 PM
Nice post Cutter... The thing is, it does seem to be the sites that have poor designs that make the most money.

KLB
03-23-2006, 01:16 PM
Nice post Cutter... The thing is, it does seem to be the sites that have poor designs that make the most money.
Maybe this is due to an inflated page rank caused by forums like this linking to the site, discussing how bad the design is and discussing how much they make.

Fender963
03-23-2006, 02:55 PM
I also remember reading somewhere that he has huge advertising expenses though. You have to take that into account as well.

James
03-23-2006, 04:42 PM
I think it's more that the people who make ugly designs are more prominently 'do-it-yourself' people who don't like hiring people to make their site pretty.

Cutter
03-23-2006, 04:52 PM
I also remember reading somewhere that he has huge advertising expenses though. You have to take that into account as well.

Depends what the definition of huge is, he says he's spending $15,000 a month on server costs while other dating sites the same size spend a million. What he is really doing is using the idea of a free dating site to pull in leads that search engines aren't reaching, and he's filtering those leads to the paid dating sites through Adsense. Whether the sites re-coop their investment is irrelevent, because there is so much competition in dating that companies don't care if they lose money as long as they can grow their user base.

Cutter
03-23-2006, 04:55 PM
Ok guys, markus just accepted my request for an interview. PM me questions you want me to ask him, I'm sending the questions to him at 9pm CST. I can only include 2 or 3 of your questions, so make them good.

Fender963
03-23-2006, 06:08 PM
How much is your advertising budget and which methods do you prefer? CPM, CPC, CPA etc....

Cutter
03-23-2006, 07:04 PM
Ok, I got that one Fender, but please PM me any additional questions if you have them.

michael_gersitz
03-23-2006, 09:02 PM
Dating sites proboally have ads that pay $1 per click. That is 1,000 clicks per day.

Cutter
03-24-2006, 01:10 PM
Interview is complete: http://www.webpublishingblog.com/exclusive.. (http://www.webpublishingblog.com/exclusive-interview-with-plentyoffishcom-creator-and-owner-markus-frind.htm)

A few interesting points he made:

-he banned Alexa and websearch toolbar or comscore from using his site in the beginning so that the site would stay below the radar

-he quit his job when the site was making 4k a month

-he says always test new designs (one of my rules)

-he thinks that paid dating site membership will shrink to 5-20% of the dating market

Jon
03-24-2006, 01:37 PM
The dating industry is tough to get into.. regardless of whether it's free or not.. I think a lot of people look at him and think "oh my god, I'm going to do that now!", but overlook that Markus has been doing this since 2001, which was a good time to get into it. Anytime you're going to release a free version of something that most people in the industry pay for, you had better be ready to invest a lot more capital into it than you think. I do agree with him that for "free" services badly designed sites do better, but that's not true in most things. For mortgage for instance, when you are trying to get people to fill out forms where they have to give out a lot of personal and otherwise confidential financial information, they are going to choose a site they feel safe on, not a site that loads quickly and has some crappy images. They want to signup with a site that represents "trust and security".. So it's different for every industry.

chromate
03-24-2006, 05:10 PM
Wow, I honestly had no idea how big plentoffish was!

I've had a front page link exchange with Markus's site for ages now. Guess I should feel quite honoured to be on his front page :)

Cutter
03-24-2006, 07:21 PM
Thats really cool, that link would probably be worth a lot of $ if it was ;)

Jon, I agree with you about design, its all about knowing your audience. Getting people to visit advertisers vs getting them to pull out the credit card are two very different things. I suspecet 90% of designers have no idea what conversion even means, and thats where the danger is. When I was in college my design class teacher said most websites were boring and they needed things like crazy cursers (that made up my mind about an art degree pretty fast.)

chromate
03-27-2006, 01:50 PM
Thanks to Jaffro for pointing out my link on the front of plentoffish is a "nofollow" link.

That's the problem with the online dating industry, everyone is so underhand. You think you've got a good link exchange going only to find a week later it's been removed or made "nofollow" without any notice. Takes way too much work managing it all to get anywhere.

cameron
03-27-2006, 06:33 PM
-he says always test new designs (one of my rules)


Test in what way?

Cutter
03-28-2006, 02:53 AM
Change layout, colors, read up on split testing as done in direct marketing. This is what I do with Adsense to increase clickthrough rates.

Masetek
03-28-2006, 04:04 AM
Thanks to Jaffro for pointing out my link on the front of plentoffish is a "nofollow" link.


Cant be happy with that. Thats happened a few times to me. Most of the time they just remove it after a few weeks. Very annoying

Blue Cat Buxton
03-28-2006, 04:54 AM
Cant be happy with that. Thats happened a few times to me. Most of the time they just remove it after a few weeks. Very annoying


But do you get any real traffic, Chromate, from the link.

chromate
03-28-2006, 07:16 AM
Not really, no. About 20 uniques a day, recently. (used to be a lot less) Surprising considering he gets 14million page views or whatever it is. But I guess most people spend their time on the sub pages, where I don't have a link.

It's not really the fact that it's "nofollow" that annoys me. If he had told me that he was going to do it, I wouldn't have really minded so much, because it's nice to be linked to from a high profile site and it does send some traffic. What's annoying is that he didn't tell me. So in effect he was getting a one way link from the front page of my site which flits in and out of page 1 on google for "dating services", so in local rank terms, he's getting a reasonable deal considering his primary keyword is "free dating services".

I've returned the favour anyway ;) (not that he'll care) lol

Cutter
03-28-2006, 04:11 PM
I don't think the engines even pay attention to nofollow.

chromate
03-28-2006, 04:36 PM
I think Google do don't they? I must admit I don't pay much attention to the specifics of SEO these days - I just follow common sense basic stuff for long term objectives.

Michel Z.
03-31-2006, 03:25 AM
Dating sites proboally have ads that pay $1 per click. That is 1,000 clicks per day.

10,000 ;)