What do u guys think of yahoo's new homepage?

[s2kinteg916]

http://www.yahoo.com

They got my vote!

[MarkB]

I like it - it just seems cleaner :)

[s2kinteg916]

Yes i feel the same way

[ozgression]

Yeah, I like it. Nice and clean... easy to navigate and find what you want.
________
marijuana dispensaries (http://dispensaries.org/)

[James]

Much better organized, much cleaner, much sexsayer, and much friendlier.

Very good.

[Xander]

Maybe its just me, but the differences are very minimal in my view.

[AndyH]

Maybe its just me, but the differences are very minimal in my view.

I am going to go a step further and say I see no difference at all ... :confused:

[incka]

Good, but could do with more phi.

[Percept]

I am going to go a step further and say I see no difference at all ... :confused:

The new beta version is a serious step towards XHTML ... this is huge for a website like Yahoo.

[moonshield]

I think it looks much better then it used to. Much more modern. Yahoo is in need of heavy changes to its user interface.

[MarkB]

Andy, are you seeing the current site, or the beta front page?

(http://www.yahoo.com/?r=1099160085 might work... dunno:))

[AndyH]

I refreshed a few times and got the new one but still, not too much of a change really. A bit more organised though.

[Emancipator]

its a bit more organized, but until yahoo starts sending me more then 1% of my traffic i just dont really care :)

[Xander]

I did look at both, but the differences were minimal. But maybe I don't use the frontpage enough to notice. If it is going to standard XHTML that is good, browser neutral pages are always good.

[ozgression]

I actually get more Yahoo traffic on my newer sites than i do from Google... further arguement for the sandbox theory. But either way, i dont really use Yahoo so it's design doent really effect me.. (although it looks good).
________
herbal health (http://herbalhealthshop.com)

[MarkB]

Same as me, Mr Gression. Some sites would be dead without the Yahoo traffic I get.