Mr. Pink
08-20-2009, 11:03 AM
I went to a few sites to generate a favicon.ico file, for my site and I noticed that the instructions for the code are not the same, depending who gives the instructions.
these are the different versions of the code:
<LINK rel="shortcut icon" href="/favicon.ico">
<LINK rel="shortcut icon" href="favicon.ico">
<LINK rel="shortcut icon" href="favicon.ico" />
<LINK rel="shortcut icon" href="favicon.ico" >
I'm assuming all version of the code are OK, but are there any browser compatibility issues, depending which version is used?
Is one version better then the others?
thanks...
PS - And finally, I've used a favicon.ico file on my other sites, in the past, without any code added to the HTML pages. So, is that code even needed?
these are the different versions of the code:
<LINK rel="shortcut icon" href="/favicon.ico">
<LINK rel="shortcut icon" href="favicon.ico">
<LINK rel="shortcut icon" href="favicon.ico" />
<LINK rel="shortcut icon" href="favicon.ico" >
I'm assuming all version of the code are OK, but are there any browser compatibility issues, depending which version is used?
Is one version better then the others?
thanks...
PS - And finally, I've used a favicon.ico file on my other sites, in the past, without any code added to the HTML pages. So, is that code even needed?