<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copyright Clearance Center, Not a Scam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2009/02/09/copyright-clearance-center-not-a-sam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2009/02/09/copyright-clearance-center-not-a-sam/</link>
	<description>Website Promotion, Generating Revenue, Website Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 22:09:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie Fierman</title>
		<link>http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2009/02/09/copyright-clearance-center-not-a-sam/#comment-30884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Fierman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/?p=176#comment-30884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online content would only create duplicate content issues if it (the content) also existed in offline form, correct?  Examples of this would be content on, say, NYT.com or People.com. I have two blogs:  if the content there only exists on the Internet - and it&#039;s licensed for use - there&#039;s no chance that it may also be licensed from another original source (because there is no other orig source).  I can see how things could get sticky, though, since a site like NYT.com republishes content present in the offline world but also creates supplemental content only available on the Web (and some party would have to draw a distinction between the content types so a licensor wouldn&#039;t have the problem you are indicating)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online content would only create duplicate content issues if it (the content) also existed in offline form, correct?  Examples of this would be content on, say, NYT.com or People.com. I have two blogs:  if the content there only exists on the Internet &#8211; and it&#8217;s licensed for use &#8211; there&#8217;s no chance that it may also be licensed from another original source (because there is no other orig source).  I can see how things could get sticky, though, since a site like NYT.com republishes content present in the offline world but also creates supplemental content only available on the Web (and some party would have to draw a distinction between the content types so a licensor wouldn&#8217;t have the problem you are indicating)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2009/02/09/copyright-clearance-center-not-a-sam/#comment-30746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/?p=176#comment-30746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, offline, in my case use in printed course packs for students.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, offline, in my case use in printed course packs for students.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2009/02/09/copyright-clearance-center-not-a-sam/#comment-30737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/?p=176#comment-30737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re talking about offline use? Online would cause duplicate content issues...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re talking about offline use? Online would cause duplicate content issues&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
