<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Small Publishers Staying Strong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2006/06/26/small-publishers-staying-strong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2006/06/26/small-publishers-staying-strong/</link>
	<description>Website Promotion, Generating Revenue, Website Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 22:09:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chromate</title>
		<link>http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2006/06/26/small-publishers-staying-strong/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chromate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2006/06/26/small-publishers-staying-strong/#comment-242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I think this is a case of crossed wires. I don&#039;t think Andrew was saying all small publishers will be out of business in 2 years - only those that don&#039;t stay competitive.

I think that&#039;s true. Things will get harder. I still find it hard to understand why web developers spend all their time developing sites for other people when they could be developing sites for themselves.

Having said that I don&#039;t think the growth rate will be quite so fast that in 2 years a LOT of people will start going of our business. Publishing successful sites is not easy to do even now and it will only get harder. Those without the determination and, more importantly, the patience to succeed will probably just give up before they pose any threat.

I think the pure website publishing industry has already seen its peak growth rate over the last 4 years or so. I think things are actually slowing down now due to increased competition and dodgy search engine algorithms. In 2 years you&#039;ll still be able to make a success of things - it&#039;ll just be that much harder due to established sites.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think this is a case of crossed wires. I don&#8217;t think Andrew was saying all small publishers will be out of business in 2 years &#8211; only those that don&#8217;t stay competitive.</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s true. Things will get harder. I still find it hard to understand why web developers spend all their time developing sites for other people when they could be developing sites for themselves.</p>
<p>Having said that I don&#8217;t think the growth rate will be quite so fast that in 2 years a LOT of people will start going of our business. Publishing successful sites is not easy to do even now and it will only get harder. Those without the determination and, more importantly, the patience to succeed will probably just give up before they pose any threat.</p>
<p>I think the pure website publishing industry has already seen its peak growth rate over the last 4 years or so. I think things are actually slowing down now due to increased competition and dodgy search engine algorithms. In 2 years you&#8217;ll still be able to make a success of things &#8211; it&#8217;ll just be that much harder due to established sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2006/06/26/small-publishers-staying-strong/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2006/06/26/small-publishers-staying-strong/#comment-240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thats what I meant Peter, the higher quality the competition gets the tougher it will be for mediocre sites to get links let alone SE rankings. Outside investment in to content could compound that problem. What was once the domain parking industry is even making moves towards the development side.

One particular niche I am in right now has a bunch of spam. I suspect the guys behind this are making a very healthy profit. The problem for them is once their free search engine traffic dries up their business model is dead. Not saying that there is anything wrong with that.. just that the people who are taking that approach should either be pocketing their profits or building a site or two for the long term.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats what I meant Peter, the higher quality the competition gets the tougher it will be for mediocre sites to get links let alone SE rankings. Outside investment in to content could compound that problem. What was once the domain parking industry is even making moves towards the development side.</p>
<p>One particular niche I am in right now has a bunch of spam. I suspect the guys behind this are making a very healthy profit. The problem for them is once their free search engine traffic dries up their business model is dead. Not saying that there is anything wrong with that.. just that the people who are taking that approach should either be pocketing their profits or building a site or two for the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2006/06/26/small-publishers-staying-strong/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websitepublisher.net/blog/2006/06/26/small-publishers-staying-strong/#comment-239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think he&#039;s right concerning lower quality sites.  He did mention mediocrity I think.  For the same reasons I think you&#039;re wise to make a major push with the quality sites.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he&#8217;s right concerning lower quality sites.  He did mention mediocrity I think.  For the same reasons I think you&#8217;re wise to make a major push with the quality sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
